August 2026: what it cost to sell $100,000

We track 623 assets. 331 have a contract on a covered chain, and 262 of those returned no on-chain price when we asked — an asset whose real market is a centralised exchange, or a receipt token never meant to trade, is invisible to this measurement rather than illiquid. The index is only ever a statement about the 78 we can see.

The same ticker is not the same market

11 tickers were measured on more than one chain this month. They are not one asset with one exit cost; they are separate pools with separate depth, and the gap between them is routinely larger than the whole spread of the index.

The practical reading: the figure you have seen quoted for a token is a figure about a market in it. If you hold the bridged version, the number that applies to you is the one for the chain your balance is actually on.

A deep pool is not a sellable one

Liquidity is the figure most sites publish instead of measuring an exit, because it can be read off a contract. These tokens each carry a pool of over a million dollars and still lost a fifth or more of a $100,000 sale:

• BASEDHYPE on Base — pool $6,100,996, median loss 97.67%

Depth is not the only thing that decides an exit. Where the depth sits in the curve, how concentrated it is in one venue, and what the router can actually reach all matter, and none of them are visible in a total. That gap is the whole reason this series exists.

There is no typical token

14.3% of measured tokens lost under 2%, and 25% lost more than 50%. The distribution has two ends and not much of a middle, which means the median is a weaker summary of it than a median usually is: there is no typical token here, there are deep markets and there are thin ones.

The two ends, by name. Dearest: BABYCLAW 99.99%, FT 99.72%, 1INCH 98.65%, BASEDHYPE 97.67%, ALIGN 92.93%. Cheapest: WM 0%, AERO 0.18%, VIRTUAL 0.67%, 1INCH 0.97%, DIEM 1.2%.

What we could not see

We track 623 assets. 331 have a contract on a chain we cover, and 78 of those returned a price we could route against. The rest are not illiquid — they are invisible to this method. An asset whose real market is a centralised exchange, and a receipt token that was never meant to trade, land in the same bucket.

That is why the headline says “of the tokens with a live on-chain market” and never “of the top 500”. The second sentence is unsayable from this data, it is the sentence this index was originally going to use, and finding out why it was wrong is the reason the denominators are printed on every month.

Check it, then cite it

Every figure above comes from one table. The series is downloadable, every token named links to its own measurement history, and the method is written down. If a number here is wrong we would rather hear it from you than not know.

Suggested citation: Cryptominium Exit-Friction Report, August 2026. https://cryptominium.com/exit-index/2026-08

The index and the full series Download the series (CSV) → Every measurement behind it → How it is measured →