November 2026: what it cost to sell $100,000

The headline went from 28.54% in October 2026 to 34.51% this month, a move of +5.97 points. That is not the same statement as “selling got harder”, and the difference matters more than the figure.

381 tokens were measured in both months. Across those, the median change was +0.82 points: 64 improved, 216 deteriorated, and 101 stayed within half a point. The two agree this month, which is the ordinary case and worth stating anyway: when they disagree it is the composition of the sample, not the market, and that is the failure mode of every index built on a universe that is still growing.

They are not one asset with one exit cost; they are separate pools with separate depth, and the gap between them is routinely larger than the whole spread of the index.

The practical reading: the figure you have seen quoted for a token is a figure about a market in it. If you hold the bridged version, the number that applies to you is the one for the chain your balance is actually on.

Liquidity is the figure most sites publish instead of measuring an exit, because it can be read off a contract. These tokens each carry a pool of over a million dollars and still lost a fifth or more of a $100,000 sale:

Depth is not the only thing that decides an exit. Where the depth sits in the curve, how concentrated it is in one venue, and what the router can actually reach all matter, and none of them are visible in a total. That gap is the whole reason this series exists.

5.6% of measured tokens lost under 2%, and 41.4% lost more than 50%. The distribution has two ends and not much of a middle, which means the median is a weaker summary of it than a median usually is: there is no typical token here, there are deep markets and there are thin ones.

We track 1,346 assets. 886 have a contract on a chain we cover, and 444 of those returned a price we could route against. The rest are not illiquid — they are invisible to this method. An asset whose real market is a centralised exchange, and a receipt token that was never meant to trade, land in the same bucket.

That is why the headline says “of the tokens with a live on-chain market” and never “of the top 500”. The second sentence is unsayable from this data, it is the sentence this index was originally going to use, and finding out why it was wrong is the reason the denominators are printed on every month.

The series is downloadable, every token named links to its own measurement history, and the method is written down. If a number here is wrong we would rather hear it from you than not know.

This report measures on-chain routing on the chains named above, at one fixed sell size. It is market information, not financial advice, and it is not a statement about any token’s value or its future.